I'm learning how to convert quadratic equations from

Alessandra Carrillo

Alessandra Carrillo

Answered question

2022-04-09

I'm learning how to convert quadratic equations from general form to standard form, in order to make them easier to graph. We know the general form is ax2+bx2+c, and the standard form is a(xh)2+k. To help with the conversion, we can expand the standard form, and see that it turns into the general form. I totally get how to go from standard to general. I can easily memorize what h and k are, and use them to consistently derive standard forms.
What I'm curious about is how to, a priori, go from the general form to the standard form? Is there a way to see that ax2+bx+c can turn into a(xh)2+k without knowing that form ahead of time? How was the form a(xh)2+k discovered in the first place? How are alternate forms of equations discovered in general? I honestly wouldn't know where to begin.
I ask out of curiosity, and because I believe knowing how to go in the other direction will help really solidify this concept for me. Even if that knowledge is above my skillset at the moment, at least an overview of what kind of math is involved may supplement this concept for me.

Answer & Explanation

bondsk384r

bondsk384r

Beginner2022-04-10Added 12 answers

To get the standard form from the general form, first factor out a, then complete the square, and finally adjust the constant term:
ax2+bx+c=a(x2+bax+ca) (1)
where I don’t yet know what u is. To find out, I multiply out (1) to get
a(x2+bax+b24a2)+au,
which is
ax2+bx+b24a+au,
If this is to be the same as the original quadratic, we must have
b24a+au=c,
meaning that
u=cb24aa=cab24a2,
and our quadratic can be written as
a(x+b2a)2+(cb24a),.
Thus, the h and k of the standard form must be
h=b2a
and k=cb24a.
Take the quadratic 2x2+3x+4 as an example. Factoring out the leading coefficient of 2 results in
2(x2+32x+2),.
Then x2+32x+2=(x+34)2+u
for some u, and since (x+34)2=x2+32x+916, u must be 2916=2316. Thus,
2x2+3x+4=2((x+34)2+2316) =2(x(34))2+234 ,
with h=-34 and k=238

gsmckibbenx7ga

gsmckibbenx7ga

Beginner2022-04-11Added 17 answers

Remember that there are four basic "geometric transformations" of the graph of an equation y=f(x). Specifically, for a constant u, we have:
- The graph of y=f(xu) is the graph of y=f(x) shifted to the right by u.
- The graph of y=f(ux) is the graph of y=f(x) "compressed horizontally" by a factor of u (and possibly reflected about the y-axis, depending on the sign of u).
- The graph of y=f(x)+u is the graph of y=f(x) shifted up by u.
- The graph of y=uf(x) is the graph of y=f(x) "stretched vertically" by a factor of u (and possibly reflected about the x-axis, depending on the sign of u).
Now - granting that a parabola is a transformation of the graph of y=x2 via stretching, shifting, and flipping - this tells us that every parabola has the form
y=u0(u1xu2)2+u3
for some u0,u1,u2,u3. Moreover, at least for parabolas (this doesn't work in general) we can combine two of these variables into a single one: the expression above is equivalent to
y=(u0u12)(x-u2u1)2+u3.
So we really only need three "transformation constants:"
Every parabola is the graph of an equation of the form
y=w0(xw1)2+w2
for some constants w0,w1,w2.
And at this point there's just one last step remaining before the transformation into standard form is something guessable: realizing that the graph of y=ax2+bx+c is a parabola. This is something you can notice just by graphing a few examples (always graph a few examples!).

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?