I'm learning about holes in rational functions in precalculus, and I'm confused as to why they exist

Cierra Castillo

Cierra Castillo

Answered question

2022-07-07

I'm learning about holes in rational functions in precalculus, and I'm confused as to why they exist, having some knowledge of limits. Say I have a function R ( x ) = ( x 5 ) ( x + 2 ) ( x + 4 ) ( x + 2 ) . If I were to find where the hole lies for this function, I would plug −2 into x 5 x + 4 which would give me a hole at ( 2 , 7 2 ). However, that turns out to be the limit of R ( x ) (using L'Hopital's Rule):
lim x 2 ( x 5 ) ( x + 2 ) ( x + 4 ) ( x + 2 ) = lim x 2 x 2 3 x 10 x 2 + 6 x + 8 = lim x 2 2 x 3 2 x + 6 = 7 2
So why is there a hole in the graph if the limit exists at ( 2 , 7 2 )? Am I misunderstanding the definition of a limit? Thanks.

Answer & Explanation

talhekh

talhekh

Beginner2022-07-08Added 15 answers

The domain of definition of the function R is the set of all reals x such that ( x + 4 ) ( x + 2 ) is not equal to 0, to avoid division by 0 when evaluating. This is the definition or a convention if you prefer. (One could do things differently, too, but this is what was agreed upon.)
It is true that the limit you mention exists. Therefore you could define a new function Q ( x ) that agrees with R ( x ) everywhere where R is defined and in addition Q ( 2 ) = 7 / 2, and this function would be a continuous function.
Thus this type of "hole" can be plugged, and one thus calls it a removable "hole" (or a removable singularity). By contrast, the "hole" at −4 cannot be plugged in this way.

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?