The evaluation, <munderover> &#x2211;<!-- ∑ --> <mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> n

Kendrick Hampton

Kendrick Hampton

Answered question

2022-06-26

The evaluation,
n = 0 1 F 2 n = 7 5 2 = ( 1 5 2 ) 3 + ( 1 + 5 2 ) 2

Answer & Explanation

Donavan Mack

Donavan Mack

Beginner2022-06-27Added 24 answers

Proof: Let us write out a few terms of this sequence, we get
a 0 = 0 , a 1 = 1 , a 2 = b , a 3 = b 2 + 1 , a 4 = b 3 + 2 b ,
The proof is by induction on N. For N=1, we have the left hand side to be
1 a 1 + 1 a 2 = 1 + 1 b
while the right hand side is
1 + 2 b a 1 a 2 = 1 + 2 b 1 b = 1 + 1 b
For N=2, we have the left hand side to be
1 a 1 + 1 a 2 + 1 a 4 = 1 + 1 b + 1 b 3 + 2 b
while the right hand side is
1 + 2 b a 3 a 4 = 1 + 2 b b 2 + 1 b 3 + 2 b = 1 + 1 b + 1 b b 2 + 1 b 3 + 2 b = 1 + 1 b + 1 b 3 + 2 b
Hence, it holds for N=1 and N=2. Now lets go ahead with induction now. Assume the result is true for N=m i.e. we have
k = 0 m 1 a 2 k = 1 + 2 b a 2 m 1 a 2 m
Now
k = 0 m + 1 1 a 2 k = 1 + 2 b a 2 m 1 a 2 m + 1 a 2 m + 1
Hence, we want to show that
a 2 m 1 a 2 m + 1 a 2 m + 1 = a 2 m + 1 1 a 2 m + 1 i.e.
1 a 2 m + 1 + a 2 m + 1 1 a 2 m + 1 = a 2 m 1 a 2 m
i.e.
a 2 m ( 1 + a 2 m + 1 1 ) = a 2 m 1 a 2 m + 1 ( )
which can be verified using the recurrence. In fact ( ), a slightly more general version of ( ), which is easier to check is true.
a 2 k ( 1 + a 4 k 1 ) = a 2 k 1 a 4 k ( )
i.e.
a 2 k 1 a 4 k a 2 k a 4 k 1 = a 2 k ( )
Hence, we get that
k = 0 N 1 a 2 k = 1 + 2 b a 2 N 1 a 2 N

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?