I am trying to solve the following problem: Let ( X , S , &#x03BC;<!-- μ --> ) be a

Patatiniuh

Patatiniuh

Answered question

2022-07-04

I am trying to solve the following problem:
Let ( X , S , μ ) be a measure space. Let 1 < p < . Let f : X × X R be such that, for every y X, the section f y is p-integrable and that
X f y p   d μ ( y ) < + .
Define, for x X,
g ( x ) = X f ( x , y ) d μ ( y ) .
Show that g L p ( μ ) and that
g p X f y p   d μ ( y ) . "

So above is the problem. We need to show (after simplifying the inequality) that
( X | X f ( x , y )   d μ ( y ) | p d μ ( x ) ) 1 p X ( X | f ( x , y ) | p   d μ ( x ) ) 1 p   d μ ( y ) .
Can you please give me some hints on how to do it? Thanks.

Answer & Explanation

eurgylchnj

eurgylchnj

Beginner2022-07-05Added 14 answers

When X is σ-finite, this is just the Minkowski integral inequality with Y = X, which you can prove using the "duality" representation of the p-norm: If ( E , F , μ ) is σ-finite, then for any measurable p [ 1 , ],
f L p = sup { E f g d μ : g 0 , g L q = 1 } .
The above identity for f L p also holds when ( E , F , μ ) is not σ-finite, provided f L p < .
To prove Minkowski's integral inequality, you can use the above identity and upper bound the integrals appearing in the supremum.

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?