Consider the following polynomial in x: p ( x ) = <munderover> &#x2211;<!-- ∑ -->

Pitrellais

Pitrellais

Answered question

2022-05-30

Consider the following polynomial in x:
p ( x ) = n = 0 2 k x n 1 2 k + 1 n = 0 2 k ( x ) n .
I want to show that p ( x ) 0 for real x.

Answer & Explanation

flonsHaroDolalv

flonsHaroDolalv

Beginner2022-05-31Added 8 answers

You can do this by showing that the numerator of
( 2 k + 1 ) p ( x ) = 2 k x 2 k + 2 + ( 2 k + 2 ) x 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 2 ) x 2 k x 2 1
has just two zeroes, at x = ± 1 (so that elsewhere it has the same sign as the denominator, since it clearly tends to + as x ± and is negative at x = 0). This can be done by looking closely at the numerator's first and second derivatives,
( 2 k + 2 ) ( 2 k ) x 2 k + 1 + ( 2 k + 2 ) ( 2 k + 1 ) x 2 k ( 2 k + 2 )
and
( 2 k + 2 ) ( 2 k + 1 ) ( 2 k ) x 2 k + ( 2 k + 2 ) ( 2 k + 1 ) ( 2 k ) x 2 k 1 = ( 2 k + 2 ) ( 2 k + 1 ) ( 2 k ) x 2 k 1 ( x + 1 )
We see that the second derivative is positive to the left of −1 and to the right of 0, and negative in between. The implies the first derivative is increasing on ( , 1 ), decreasing on ( 1 , 0 ), and increasing on ( 0 , ). Since the value of the first derivative at x=-1 is ( 2 k + 2 ) ( 2 k + ( 2 k + 1 ) 1 ) = 0, the first derivative is non-positive on ( , 0 ), so the numerator is strictly decreasing on that interval, passing through 0 at x = 1. On ( 0 , 1 ), the first derivative increases from a negative value at x=0 to a positive value at x=1 so the numerator decreases to a minimum (negative) value and then increases to pass through 0 at x=1. It continues increasing on ( 1 , ), and thus it has just the two zeroes, at x = ± 1

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?