The matter of explicitly finding the order of a rational function on an elliptic curve in the projec

Shamar Reese

Shamar Reese

Answered question

2022-05-19

The matter of explicitly finding the order of a rational function on an elliptic curve in the projective plane at infinity (i.e. at the point (0,1,0)) still seems unclear.
For example, Silverman (in The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves) states that the order of the rational function y on the elliptic curve
y 2 = ( x e 1 ) ( x e 2 ) ( x e 3 ) ,
where e 1 , e 2 , and e 3 are distinct, is −3. That is, the function y has a pole of order 3 at (0,1,0). I have no doubt that this is true; I'd like to know a simple way to see it, based on projective coordinates and independent of the fact that the sum of the orders of the zeros of y is 3 (which I understand).

Answer & Explanation

Kaylyn Ewing

Kaylyn Ewing

Beginner2022-05-20Added 9 answers

This fairly old-fashioned argument is the way I look at the situation. Homogenize y 2 = x 3 + a x + b to Y 2 Z = X 3 + a X Z 2 + Z 3 , then dehomogenize by setting Y = 1 to get ζ = ξ 3 + a ξ ζ 2 + ζ 3 . The point you’re interested in is now (0,0).
What does the curve look like there? Clearly ξ is a local uniformizer, and ζ has a triple zero there. If you don’t see that right away, use the equation relating the two letters to see that ζ expands as a power series that starts ζ = ξ 3 + a ξ 7 + . Now, what are the original x and y in terms of ξ and ζ? Yes: x = ξ / ζ and y = 1 / ζ, and there you are.

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?