Principal Logarithmic Question Here is a question that is driving me insane: Show that p .

bs1tuaz

bs1tuaz

Answered question

2022-05-27

Principal Logarithmic Question
Here is a question that is driving me insane:
Show that p . v z 1 × p . v z + 1 = p . v . z 2 1 for R e ( z ) < 1. (p.v. stands for the principal singular valued logarithmic function.
Show that p . v . z 2 1 is analytic for R e ( z ) < 1
Show that ( p . v . z + 1 ) ( p . v . z 1 ) is analytic on the complement of z : 1 R e ( z ) 1 , I m ( z ) = 0
How that negative appears, I do not know. Working backwards I see that 1 = e x p ( L o g ( 1 ) ). That is all I can see. Thank you to all for your help !
EDIT: I have added to two following questions which I still can not do. This is really bothering - I seem to be missing something very important.

Answer & Explanation

Maximo Sweeney

Maximo Sweeney

Beginner2022-05-28Added 7 answers

The branch cut of the principal value square root is the real interval ( , 0 ]. Note that z 2 1 ( , 0 ] for z on the imaginary axis or on the real interval [ 1 , 1 ], while z 1 ( , 0 ] for z ( , 1 ] and z + 1 ( , 0 ] for z ( , 1 ]] . In each of the regions R e ( z ) < 0, I m ( z ) > 0 and R e ( z ) < 0, I m ( z ) > 0 all three square roots are analytic, and either z 1 z + 1 = + z 2 1 or z 1 z + 1 = z 2 1 . So which is it? E.g. you might try it for z = 1 + ϵ i and z = 1 ϵ i where ϵ > 0 is small.

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?