An integral involving the inverse of f ( x ) = log &#x2061;<!-- ⁡ --> x

uri2e4g

uri2e4g

Answered question

2022-07-09

An integral involving the inverse of f ( x ) = log x log cos x + x tan x
Let the function f : ( 0 , π 2 ) R be defined as
f ( x ) = log x log cos x + x tan x .
Let its inverse be denoted as f ( 1 ) : R ( 0 , π 2 ) , it satisfies
z R ,     f ( f ( 1 ) ( z ) ) = z .
Consider the integral
I = 0 1 z e z f ( 1 ) ( z ) d z .
Is it possible to evaluate the integral I in a closed form?

Answer & Explanation

Antonio Dickerson

Antonio Dickerson

Beginner2022-07-10Added 5 answers

I know it has been some time now but we can transform this question into something more manageable. We'll just use the substitution z = f ( x ) with d z = f ( x ) d x. The bounds of integration change to the points x where f ( x ) is respectively 0 or 1. Call these points x 0 and x 1 .
Numerically they are
x 0 = 0.576412723
x 1 = 0.807626251
And so we have
I = x 0 x 1 f ( x ) e f ( x ) f ( 1 ) ( f ( x ) ) f ( x ) d x = x 0 x 1 x f ( x ) f ( x ) e f ( x ) d x
Now we perform integration by parts with
u = x f ( x ) , d u = ( f ( x ) + x f ( x ) ) d x
d v = f ( x ) e f ( x ) d x , v = e f ( x )
and the integral becomes
I = x 1 f ( x 1 ) e f ( x 1 ) x 0 f ( x 0 ) e f ( x 0 ) x 0 x 1 f ( x ) e f ( x ) d x x 0 x 1 x f ( x ) e f ( x ) d x
Since f ( x 0 ) = 0 and f ( x 1 ) = 1 we have
I = x 1 x 0 x 1 f ( x ) e f ( x ) d x x 0 x 1 x f ( x ) e f ( x ) d x
Now we perform integration by parts on the latter integral with
u = x , d u = d x
d v = f ( x ) e f ( x ) d x , v = e f ( x )
and we get
I = x 1 x 1 e f ( x 1 ) + x 0 e f ( x 0 ) x 0 x 1 f ( x ) e f ( x ) d x + x 0 x 1 e f ( x ) d x
It turns out we can perform the integration in the first integral since
e f ( x ) = x cos x e x tan x
and
e f ( x ) d x = e x tan x cos x
After cleaning up a bit
I = x 0 + e x 1 tan x 1 cos x 1 e x 0 tan x 0 cos x 0 x 0 x 1 f ( x ) e f ( x ) d x
and this is where I am getting stuck. Mathematica is having a problem with it too. On [ x 0 , x 1 ] we have
f ( x ) e f ( x ) = x e x tan ( x ) cos x ( ln ( x cos x ) + x tan x )
We also have another form
f ( x ) e f ( x ) = ( x 2 sin x cos 2 x + x cos x ln ( x cos x ) ) e x tan x
which suggest that we might have better luck looking at the following two integrals
J = x 0 x 1 x 2 sin x cos 2 x e x tan x d x
and
K = x 0 x 1 ln ( x cos x ) e x tan x d x
The other problem perhaps, is that x 0 and x 1 are given numerically. I have no idea if one could find a closed for expression for them or even perhaps something like a series representation.
EDIT1: I'm not sure if this could be called a reduction but using the equation defining f ( x ) we can say that
cos x 1 e x 1 tan x 1 = x 1 e 1 + 2 x 1 tan x 1
cos x 1 0 e x 0 tan x 0 = x 0 e 2 x 0 tan x 0

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?