Showing that A problem in my textbook asks me to show that . After I've tried solving this for a long time, I looked at the textbook's hint and it said that I should consider the homomorphism , and this would be a surjective ring homomorphism whose kernel is the ideal , so I would be done. The fact that this is a ring homomorphism is pretty obvious to me. However, I am really struggling to show that this function is surjective and to find the kernel. I think that this all stems from the fact that I am not used to the arithmetic properties of polynomial rings in two indeterminates. Anyway, back to the problem. For the surjectivity I tried playing arround with a few polynomials and I hoped to kind of guess the right one, but no succes. Showing that is really straightforward, but the other inclusion is really killing me. So, how should I go about doing this?
Answer & Explanation
Patrick Arnold
Beginner2022-11-09Added 21 answers
Step 1 Kernel: Doing polynomial division where you have two polynomials in multiple indeterminates is in general a tricky business where you first have to fix an ordering. In this case, we can kind of hack our way through. Let f(X,Y) be the polynomial we want to divide by and . We can write . When we divide by , we are effectively saying replace with -1 and likewise with and -1. So you can get a "remainder" where all the X terms have degree 1 and Y terms have degree 1. Step 2 Now, evaluate at (i,i) and (i,-i) to see
You can solve the simultaneous equations in to see that all have to be 0. Surjective: Let . We look at the "remainder" term from before . We want . You get and . You can again repeat the same thing as before and solve for the simultaneous equations.
Brenda Jordan
Beginner2022-11-10Added 3 answers
Step 1 Question: "So, how should I go about doing this?" Answer:
If it follows
hence
hence the map is surjective. The quotient
has a basis given as follows
and you must use this basis to give an explicit isomorphism
Step 2 You find
You must check that the following vectors in are linearly independent: