The accompanying data on y = normalized energy (displaystyle{left(frac{{J}}{{m}}{2}frac{{J}}{{m}^{{2}}}right)}) and x = intraocular pressure (mmHg) appeared in a scatterplot in the article &ldquo;Evaluating the Risk of Eye Injuries: Intraocular Pressure During High Speed Projectile Impacts&rdquo; (Current Eye Research, 2012: 43&ndash;49); an estimated regression function was superimposed on the plot. x2761197642571339801278219008 y155314999328131667874116526 x2078219028143979606390525731 y267701652698686640122030730 The standardized residuals resulting from fitting the simple linear regression model (in the same order as the observations) are .98, -1.57, 1.47, .50, -.76, -.84, 1.47, -.85, -1.03, -.20, .40, and .81. Construct a plot of e* versus x and comment. [Note: The model fit in the cited article was not linear.]

Question

The accompanying data on y = normalized energy (displaystyle{left(frac{{J}}{{m}}{2}frac{{J}}{{m}^{{2}}}right)}) and x = intraocular pressure (mmHg) appeared in a scatterplot in the article &amp;ldquo;Evaluating the Risk of Eye Injuries: Intraocular Pressure During High Speed Projectile Impacts&amp;rdquo; (Current Eye Research, 2012: 43&amp;ndash;49); an estimated regression function was superimposed on the plot. x2761197642571339801278219008 y155314999328131667874116526 x2078219028143979606390525731 y267701652698686640122030730 The standardized residuals resulting from fitting the simple linear regression model (in the same order as the observations) are .98, -1.57, 1.47, .50, -.76, -.84, 1.47, -.85, -1.03, -.20, .40, and .81. Construct a plot of e* versus x and comment. [Note: The model fit in the cited article was not linear.]

yagombyeR · Accepted Answer

A simple linear regression model does not appear to be appropriate.

The accompanying data on y = normalized energy (J/m2J/m^2) and x = intraocular pressure (mmHg) appeared in a scatterplot in the article “Evaluating th

Answered question

Answer & Explanation

New Questions in College Statistics