My brain doesn't work right anymore. I have a traumatic brain injury and one of the many areas I have trouble with is math - an area that was once naturally easy and intuitive for me. I remember standard deviations, generally, and have read up on what they indicate broadly and how they are reached. When I was tested for my brain injury, there were some tests in which my abilities were worse than 3 SDs below the mean! [I am a professional with a master's degree, and was one of those students who aced everything with ease. This information on my current condition, however, matches pretty well, I think, my current state, post injury. I struggle greatly with many varied kinds of things.]So far as I can recall, 1 SD is a significant enough deviation that I don't recall anyone ever talking about anything greater than 2 SDs above or below the mean. So my question is how "bad," may I ask, are scores such as: 0.7 SD below the mean, 1.7 SD below the mean, and a score of 3.2 SDs below the mean. I am asking for general but concrete advice on how to interpret these numbers generally, of course, and hold no one there responsible. I just want to better understand the significance of my scores, mathematically. The brain injury staff mince and avoid answering my questions about this, so maybe someone here will help me understand this information.

Question

My brain doesn&#039;t work right anymore. I have a traumatic brain injury and one of the many areas I have trouble with is math - an area that was once naturally easy and intuitive for me. I remember standard deviations, generally, and have read up on what they indicate broadly and how they are reached. When I was tested for my brain injury, there were some tests in which my abilities were worse than 3 SDs below the mean! [I am a professional with a master&#039;s degree, and was one of those students who aced everything with ease. This information on my current condition, however, matches pretty well, I think, my current state, post injury. I struggle greatly with many varied kinds of things.]So far as I can recall, 1 SD is a significant enough deviation that I don&#039;t recall anyone ever talking about anything greater than 2 SDs above or below the mean. So my question is how &quot;bad,&quot; may I ask, are scores such as: 0.7 SD below the mean, 1.7 SD below the mean, and a score of 3.2 SDs below the mean. I am asking for general but concrete advice on how to interpret these numbers generally, of course, and hold no one there responsible. I just want to better understand the significance of my scores, mathematically. The brain injury staff mince and avoid answering my questions about this, so maybe someone here will help me understand this information.

Charlie Powers · Accepted Answer

This is pretty low. With a normal distribution, 99.7 percent of the population lies within 3 standard deviations from the norm (between -3 and +3), that means the remaining .3 percent is split between the top and bottom. 95 percent is with 2 standard deviations and 68 percent is within one standard deviation.So:-1 SD would have 16 percent of the population below it.-2 SD would have 2.5 percent of the population below it.-3 SD would have only .15 percent of the population below.Standard deviations are a way to represent what is called a normal distribution, so basically you have an average and the population is distributed on both sides. There is not really a good way to compute it by hand, but it is typically looked up in a table or done using a calculator function. It is essentially a bell curve, and the percentages correspond to the area under certain parts of the curve.−0.3 would have about 38% below−0.7 would have about 24% below−1.7 would have about 14% below−3.2 would has less than 1% below

terrasson81sgt · Accepted Answer

Thank you kindly for your assistance.

My brain doesn't work right anymore. I have a traumatic brain injury and one of the many areas I h

Answered question

Answer & Explanation

New Questions in College Statistics