Let X be a random variable with finite expectation, and suppose that E[e^{-X}] =< 1. Prove that E[X] >= P(X >= 2).

Josie Kennedy

Josie Kennedy

Answered question

2022-11-18

Let X be a random variable with finite expectation, and suppose that E [ e X ] 1. Prove that E [ X ] P ( X 2 ).<br<My first thought was to use Markov's inequality, but I can only use that if X is non-negative, and in any case, the resulting inequality doesn't seem very helpful. Even if I assume that X c and apply it to Y = X + c, I'm left to show P ( X 2 ) c c + 1 , which doesn't seem like it's always true.
I'm primarily unsure of how to use the E [ e X ] condition; Jensen's inequality tells me that the expectation is non-negative but there's presumably more to it.

Answer & Explanation

Antwan Wiley

Antwan Wiley

Beginner2022-11-19Added 13 answers

Step 1
I'm not entirely sure how the hypothesis about the expectation comes into play, but here's my solution. I'll simply use the Markov inequality for a non-negative r.v. and a > 0 in the form
E [ X ] a P ( X a )
with a = 2. Remembering that probabilities are non-negative and using Markov we have:
E [ X ] P ( X 2 ) + P ( X 2 ) P ( X 2 )
Edit after the comments about non-negativity:
I think I saw the light :D I use the extended form of Markov inequality for monotonically increasing function:
Step 2
Theorem
Let φ be a monotonically increasing function for x > 0 and let X be a r.v., a > 0 , φ ( a ) > 0. Then
P ( X a ) E [ φ ( X ) ] φ ( a )
In our case I'll consider the (somehwat artificial) function φ ( x ) := x + e x 1, which we can prove satisfy all the hypothesis with a = 2. Hence, since 1 / φ ( a ) 1 and using the bound for e X , we have
P ( X a ) E [ X + e X 1 ] φ ( a ) E [ X ] + E [ e X ] 1 E [ X ]

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

New Questions in High school probability

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?