Simplifying Integral Expression w/ Antiderivative I'm trying to simplify this formula here. For the

April Bush

April Bush

Answered question

2022-06-15

Simplifying Integral Expression w/ Antiderivative
I'm trying to simplify this formula here. For the most part, evaluating this expression is straightforward. However I am very confused about how to approach this last term in the expression. I want to simplify this part of the formula and break it down further if possible by coming up with an antiderivative formulation or something similar to make it more understandable, and to be able to evaluate it in terms of its unknowns. It's clearly related to the normal distribution but I'm unsure of how to simplify it in terms of the normal as well. How should I approach this? What would be the best way to evaluate this term?

Answer & Explanation

Samantha Reid

Samantha Reid

Beginner2022-06-16Added 22 answers

Step 1
Ultimately, it seems like you want a nice expression for integrals of the form (1) a b e x 2 d x . .
You ask for an antiderivative. Unfortunately, no antiderivative of this expression exists in terms of elementary functions. If you're looking to write it in terms of named special functions, then you might think of (1) as a 0 e x 2 d x + 0 b e x 2 d x and consider integrals of the form 0 b e x 2 d x ..
Step 2
By a change of variables, this can be written as 1 2 0 b e x x 1 / 2 d x x ,, which is the lower incomplete Gamma function 1 2 γ ( 1 2 , b ) ..
This comes up frequently, and one can understand it numerically pretty quickly.

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?