Compute <munderover> &#x2211;<!-- ∑ --> <mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> m =

Dale Tate

Dale Tate

Answered question

2022-06-23

Compute m = 1 n = 1 p = 1 ( 1 ) m + n + p m + n + p

Answer & Explanation

Dwayne James

Dwayne James

Beginner2022-06-24Added 18 answers

This didn' fit in a comment
m = 1 n = 1 ( p = 1 ( 1 ) ( m + n ) + p ( m + n ) + p ± ( 1 ) m + n k = 1 m + n ( 1 ) k k ) = m = 1 n = 1 ( ( 1 ) ( m + n ) p = 1 ( 1 ) p ( m + n ) + p ± ( 1 ) m + n k = 1 m + n ( 1 ) k k ) = m = 1 n = 1 ( ( 1 ) ( m + n ) p = 1 ( 1 ) p ( m + n ) + p + ( 1 ) m + n k = 1 m + n ( 1 ) k k ( 1 ) m + n k = 1 m + n ( 1 ) k k ) = m = 1 n = 1 ( ( 1 ) ( m + n ) p = 1 ( 1 ) p p ( 1 ) m + n k = 1 m + n ( 1 ) k k ) = m = 1 n = 1 ( 1 ) ( m + n ) log ( 2 ) Φ Lerch ( 1 , 1 , 1 + n + m ) + ( 1 ) m + n log ( 2 ) = m = 1 n = 1 ( 1 ) ( m + n ) 2 log ( 2 ) = 0 ? m = 1 n = 1 Φ Lerch ( 1 , 1 , 1 + n + m ) = m = 1 n = 1 Φ Lerch ( 1 , 1 , 1 + n + m ) ,
and this is where I give up for now. W|A can do some examples, that make me believe, that this doesn't converge

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?