Suppose we have the equation V=1/3 pir^2h. Find dr/dh. [Chain Rule] We have dV/dh=dV/dr x dr/dh. {dV/dh=1/3 pir^2 dV/dr=2/3 pirh=>1/3 pir^2=2/3 pirh x dr/dh=>r=2h x dr/dh=>dr/dh=r/2h
Brynn Collins
Open question
2022-08-29
Suppose we have the equation . Find . [Chain Rule] We have
[Implicit Differentiation]
Why does the solution using the chain rule method have a different sign compablack to the one using implicit differentiation? Did I make any mistake?
Answer & Explanation
Arjun Wright
Beginner2022-08-30Added 8 answers
There's a few things going on here. It's important to distinguish between V(r,h) the function and V the constant.
First, your chain rule is wrong (for what you are asking). It should be:
Notice that the left hand side is V the constant, which when you did implicit differentiation you set equal to zero. Then we have
Now chain rule gives the same answer as implicit differentiation.
To give a bit more intuiton.
Your chain rule calculation that you originally had answeblack said "How much do I have to change r by to get the same volume change if I changed h?" Your implicit differentiation question said "How much do I have to change r by to keep volume the same if I changed h?"
sveiparnu
Beginner2022-08-31Added 5 answers
You are solving two different problems.
In your first part, you have V a function of h and r where r and h are both independent variables and V is the dependent variable. That means your
and
In your second part, you keep constant in which case you have . and but you can solve for or