I've looked all over and I can't find a good proof of why the diagonals of a rhombus should intersec

Kendrick Hampton

Kendrick Hampton

Answered question

2022-06-17

I've looked all over and I can't find a good proof of why the diagonals of a rhombus should intersect at right angles. I can intuitively see its true, just by drawing rhombuses, but I'm trying to prove that the slopes of the diagonals are negative reciprocals and its not working out.

I'm defining my rhombus as follows: [ ( 0 , 0 ) , ( a , 0 ) , ( b , c ) , ( a + b , c ) ]

I've managed to figure out that c = a 2 b 2 and that the slopes of the diagonals are a 2 b 2 a + b and a 2 b 2 a b

What I can't figure out is how they can be negative reciprocals of one another.

I mean to say that I could not find the algebraic proof. I've seen and understand the geometric proof, but I needed help translating it into coordinate form.

Answer & Explanation

Blaine Foster

Blaine Foster

Beginner2022-06-18Added 33 answers

Another way to say that the slopes are opposite reciprocals is to say that their product is 1.
a 2 b 2 a + b a 2 b 2 a b = ( a 2 b 2 ) 2 ( a + b ) ( a b ) = ( a 2 b 2 ) a 2 b 2 = 1
Semaj Christian

Semaj Christian

Beginner2022-06-19Added 12 answers

One more way of looking at it is by factoring a 2 b 2 while it's inside the square root. Then
a 2 b 2 a + b = ( a b ) ( a + b ) a + b = a b a + b a 2 b 2 a b = ( a b ) ( a + b ) a b = a + b a b
From here, it's easier to see that they have the correct relationship.

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

New Questions in Elementary geometry

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?