Let <mi mathvariant="normal">&#x25B3;<!-- △ --> A B C be a triangle of sides AB, AC a

pablos28spainzd

pablos28spainzd

Answered question

2022-07-15

Let A B C be a triangle of sides AB, AC and BC which has the following equations
A B a 1 x + b 1 y + c 1 = 0 A C a 2 x + b 2 y + c 2 = 0 B C p x + q y + r = 0
Then an angle A is acute if
| a 1 b 1 p q | | p q a 2 b 2 | ( a 1 a 2 + b 1 b 2 ) < 0
And the angle A is obtuse if
| a 1 b 1 p q | | p q a 2 b 2 | ( a 1 a 2 + b 1 b 2 ) > 0
But I absolutely have no idea how to prove this theorem.

Answer & Explanation

engaliar0l

engaliar0l

Beginner2022-07-16Added 13 answers

Step 1
For this proof I will assume, naturally, that none of the lines are parallel and they do not all intersect in one point. I will also assume for the moment that r 0 so this line does not pass through the origin.
Consider two lines parallel to AB and AC, call them OP and OQ, whose equations, respectively are
a 1 x + b 1 y = 0
and
a 2 x + b 2 y = 0
These lines meet BC at points P and Q. Since triangles ABC and OPQ are similar with A the same as O, it is sufficient to derive the result for O = θ instead.
The angle θ will be acute if cos θ > 0 and obtuse if cos θ < 0.
Since
cos θ = O P O Q | O P | | O Q | , ,
so for the acute angle, we just require
O P O Q > 0
Solving simultaneously, we get the coordinates of P to be
( r b 1 a 1 q b 1 p , r a 1 a 1 q b 1 p )
Correspondingly, the coordinates of Q are the same but will the suffix changed from 1 to 2.
Therefore the required dot product is
r b 1 a 1 q b 1 p r b 2 a 2 q b 2 p + r a 1 a 1 q b 1 p r a 2 a 2 q b 2 p
= r 2 ( a 1 a 2 + b 1 b 2 ) | a 1 b 1 p q | | a 2 b 2 p q |
Noting that r 0 , for the angle to be acute, therefore, we require
| a 1 b 1 p q | | a 2 b 2 p q | ( a 1 a 2 + b 1 b 2 ) > 0 , ,
with the inequality reversed for the obtuse angle.
Note that this is the same formula as that provided by the OP, but expressed, in my opinion, in a better way.
In the case that r = 0 , then we would translate all three lines so that the intersection point of the first two lines became the origin, and the same argument would apply

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

New Questions in High school geometry

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?