2−17: Let {a_n} be a bounded sequence of real numbers. Then: (a) lim sup a_n=L if and only if, for any epsilon>0, there are infinitely many terms of {a_n} in (L−epsilon,L+epsilon) but only finitely many terms of {an} with a_n>L+epsilon. Proves directly that lim sup{a_n+b_n} ≤ lim sup{a_n}+lim sup{b_n}.

yongenelowk

yongenelowk

Answered question

2022-08-11

 Theorem  2 17 :  Let  { a n }  be a bounded sequence of real numbers. Then:   (a)  lim sup a n = L  if and only if, for any  ε > 0 ,  there are infinitely many terms of  { a n }  in  ( L ε , L + ε )  but only finitely many terms of  { a n }  with  a n > L + ε .
Proves directly that lim sup { a n + b n } lim sup { a n } + lim sup { b n }

Answer & Explanation

Payton Mcbride

Payton Mcbride

Beginner2022-08-12Added 18 answers

Suppose that exists c > 0 such that
lim sup n a n + b n = lim sup n a n + lim sup n b n + c
call A := lim sup n a n ,     B := lim sup n b n , then by the theorem exists n 0 such that
n > n 0 :   b n B
so
n > n 0 :   a n + b n B + a n
then,
c = lim sup n a n + b n B A = lim sup n > n 0 a n + b n A B lim sup n a n + B B A =
contradiction

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

New Questions in High school geometry

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?