I am carrying out a category on discrete arithmetic and i'm inquisitive about skipping my faculties transition courses so that you can take a rigorous theory path next semester (topology, analysis, abstract algebra). What are a few properly transition books for me to examine that provide troubles and a few solutions so i will monitor my development, as well as being very , almost laboriously, particular in every step of evidence such as theorem packages. as an instance, i have observed abbots expertise analysis to be pretty cogent but Laczkovich Conjecture and evidence to be lacking some data important for me to understand some proofs as much as I would love. thank you for any assist

fluerkg

fluerkg

Answered question

2022-10-12

I am carrying out a category on discrete arithmetic and i'm inquisitive about skipping my faculties transition courses so that you can take a rigorous theory path next semester (topology, analysis, abstract algebra). What are a few properly transition books for me to examine that provide troubles and a few solutions so i will monitor my development, as well as being very , almost laboriously, particular in every step of evidence such as theorem packages. as an instance, i have observed abbots expertise analysis to be pretty cogent but Laczkovich Conjecture and evidence to be lacking some data important for me to understand some proofs as much as I would love. thank you for any assist

Answer & Explanation

Claire Love

Claire Love

Beginner2022-10-13Added 14 answers

Do stick with Laczkovich's Conjecture and proof. this is a primary elegance research mathematician who has written an stylish and exquisite account of how mathematicians think. when you have an opportunity to examine from the "gods" always take it even though you can want to supplement it with less complicated stuff.
The Abbott ebook might be considered "analysis light" although it appears to be nicely-written and useful at that stage. here is Bartle's review of that e book, which should indicate to you that it's far preparatory to the more advanced courses that you'll be taking wherein they throw you into the deep cease for certain.
The author has written an interesting book designed as a text for a one-semester course for students (1) who may not intend to pursue graduate study in mathematics, and (2) whose previous courses are intuitive rather than rigorous. He regards his tasks to be: to demonstrate the need for rigor and precision in analysis, to teach the students what constitutes a rigorous proof, and to expose them to "the tantalizing complexities of the real line, to the subtleties of different flavors of convergence, and to the intellectual delights hidden in the paradoxes of the infinite''.
Although the chapter headings are entirely predictable, the content is not. Page 1 starts with a proof that 2–√ is not rational; the first topic in Chapter 2 is the rearrangement of infinite (and double) series; Chapter 3 starts with a discussion of the Cantor set. Having gotten the students' attention, the author does some serious analysis, but always with a light touch. He also expects the students to do their part by leaving to them (with copious hints) the details of many of the steps in the proofs. This enables him to cover a surprising amount of material in an attractive and stimulating manner.
Students who work their way through this text will have seen a lot of interesting analysis and have developed a good understanding of the material. (Some of them may even decide to pursue graduate study in mathematics.)
Reviewed by R. G. Bartle in Math Reviews

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

New Questions in High school statistics

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?