Let E &#x2282;<!-- ⊂ --> <mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mi mathvariant="double-struc

Yahir Tucker

Yahir Tucker

Answered question

2022-06-15

Let E R be a Borel set and suppose that ( f k ) k N is a sequence of Lebesgue measurable functions defined on E. Assume that lim k + f k ( x ) = f ( x ) for almost every x and that there exists a Lebesgue integrable function g such that | f k ( x ) | g ( x ) for almost every x E and every k N . Fix ε > 0 and define A k ε = { x E : | f k ( x ) f ( x ) | ε }. Is it true that
lim j + | k j A k ε | = 0 ?
( | | is the Lebesgue measure)
The only thing that I noticed is that | A k ε | k + 0, as a consequence of Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem.
Does anyone know if this is true or not (and why?)?

Answer & Explanation

luisjoseblash2

luisjoseblash2

Beginner2022-06-16Added 16 answers

True. For every j  { 1 , 2 ,  } define B j :=  k  j A k ε . Then B 1  B 2  B 2  , and λ (  j = 1  B j ) = λ ( | f k ( x )  f ( x ) |  ε  i . o . ) = 0, since lim k   f k ( x ) = f ( x ) almost everywhere. So, if we can demonstrate that λ ( B 1 ) < , then by the continuity of measures lim j   λ ( B j ) = 0. In fact, λ ( B 1 )  λ ( g  ε 2 ) < : the first inequality is due to the fact that if x  B 1 , then | f k ( x )  f ( x ) |  ε for some k  { 1 , 2 ,  }, and almost everywhere | f k ( x ) | , | f ( x ) |  g ( x ); Moreover, the fact that g is integrable accounts for the second inequality.

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?