abbracciopj

2022-06-20

Interpret Logarithmic Values like Mean and Std

let's say i have a series of data containing prices on the log scale. How would i interpret a arithmetic mean of 0.55 and a std of 0.69 (both metrics are computed with the log prices).

Is there an intuitive explanation in terms of percentage change or anything similar?

let's say i have a series of data containing prices on the log scale. How would i interpret a arithmetic mean of 0.55 and a std of 0.69 (both metrics are computed with the log prices).

Is there an intuitive explanation in terms of percentage change or anything similar?

timmeraared

Beginner2022-06-21Added 22 answers

Let ${x}_{i}$ your observations. Then the (observed) arithmetic mean ${\hat{\mu}}_{\mathrm{log}}$ of the logarithm of those is

$\frac{\sum _{i=1}^{n}\mathrm{log}({x}_{i})}{n}=\frac{\mathrm{log}\left(\prod _{i=1}^{n}{x}_{i}\right)}{n}=\mathrm{log}\left(\prod _{i=1}^{n}{x}_{i}^{1/n}\right)$

which is the logarithm of the (observed) geometric mean of the original values (i.e. $\mathrm{exp}({\hat{\mu}}_{\mathrm{log}})$ is the geometric mean of the ${x}_{i}$).

The (observed) standard deviation of these values is

${\hat{\sigma}}_{\mathrm{log}}=\sqrt{\frac{\sum _{i=1}^{n}(\mathrm{log}({x}_{i})-{\hat{\mu}}_{\mathrm{log}}{)}^{2}}{n-1}}$

but the ${}^{2}$ makes it a bit more difficult to transform the way we transformed ${\hat{\mu}}_{\mathrm{log}}$ above. However, $\mathrm{exp}({\hat{\sigma}}_{\mathrm{log}})$ does have an interpretation as a measure of deviation from the (geometric) mean, not in terms of difference but in terms of ratio.

When you have a lot of observations where exactly half of them are −1 and exactly half of them are 1, then the arithmetic mean is 0, and the standard deviation is a little larger than 1 (it tends to 1 as the number of observations grows), which is the observed deviation from the arithmetic mean in all cases.

In exactly the same way, for a long list of observations where exactly half are $\frac{1}{2}$ and exactly half are 2, the geometric mean $\mathrm{exp}({\hat{\mu}}_{\mathrm{log}})$ is 1, and the "geometric standard deviation", $\mathrm{exp}({\hat{\sigma}}_{\mathrm{log}})$ is a little larger than 2 (and tends to 2 as the number of observations grows), since all the observations deviate from the geometric mean by a factor of 2.

In your case, this means that you have observed a geometric mean of $\mathrm{exp}(0.55)\approx 1.73$, and a standard multiplicative deviation from that mean of $\mathrm{exp}(0.69)\approx 1.99$. So what would usually be an interval of "mean plus or minus a standard deviation" now becomes

$[1.73/1.99,1.73\cdot 1.99]=[0.87,3.46]$

$\frac{\sum _{i=1}^{n}\mathrm{log}({x}_{i})}{n}=\frac{\mathrm{log}\left(\prod _{i=1}^{n}{x}_{i}\right)}{n}=\mathrm{log}\left(\prod _{i=1}^{n}{x}_{i}^{1/n}\right)$

which is the logarithm of the (observed) geometric mean of the original values (i.e. $\mathrm{exp}({\hat{\mu}}_{\mathrm{log}})$ is the geometric mean of the ${x}_{i}$).

The (observed) standard deviation of these values is

${\hat{\sigma}}_{\mathrm{log}}=\sqrt{\frac{\sum _{i=1}^{n}(\mathrm{log}({x}_{i})-{\hat{\mu}}_{\mathrm{log}}{)}^{2}}{n-1}}$

but the ${}^{2}$ makes it a bit more difficult to transform the way we transformed ${\hat{\mu}}_{\mathrm{log}}$ above. However, $\mathrm{exp}({\hat{\sigma}}_{\mathrm{log}})$ does have an interpretation as a measure of deviation from the (geometric) mean, not in terms of difference but in terms of ratio.

When you have a lot of observations where exactly half of them are −1 and exactly half of them are 1, then the arithmetic mean is 0, and the standard deviation is a little larger than 1 (it tends to 1 as the number of observations grows), which is the observed deviation from the arithmetic mean in all cases.

In exactly the same way, for a long list of observations where exactly half are $\frac{1}{2}$ and exactly half are 2, the geometric mean $\mathrm{exp}({\hat{\mu}}_{\mathrm{log}})$ is 1, and the "geometric standard deviation", $\mathrm{exp}({\hat{\sigma}}_{\mathrm{log}})$ is a little larger than 2 (and tends to 2 as the number of observations grows), since all the observations deviate from the geometric mean by a factor of 2.

In your case, this means that you have observed a geometric mean of $\mathrm{exp}(0.55)\approx 1.73$, and a standard multiplicative deviation from that mean of $\mathrm{exp}(0.69)\approx 1.99$. So what would usually be an interval of "mean plus or minus a standard deviation" now becomes

$[1.73/1.99,1.73\cdot 1.99]=[0.87,3.46]$

Which expression has both 8 and n as factors???

One number is 2 more than 3 times another. Their sum is 22. Find the numbers

8, 14

5, 17

2, 20

4, 18

10, 12Perform the indicated operation and simplify the result. Leave your answer in factored form

$\left[\frac{(4x-8)}{(-3x)}\right].\left[\frac{12}{(12-6x)}\right]$ An ordered pair set is referred to as a ___?

Please, can u convert 3.16 (6 repeating) to fraction.

Write an algebraic expression for the statement '6 less than the quotient of x divided by 3 equals 2'.

A) $6-\frac{x}{3}=2$

B) $\frac{x}{3}-6=2$

C) 3x−6=2

D) $\frac{3}{x}-6=2$Find: $2.48\xf74$.

Multiplication $999\times 999$ equals.

Solve: (128÷32)÷(−4)=

A) -1

B) 2

C) -4

D) -3What is $0.78888.....$ converted into a fraction? $\left(0.7\overline{8}\right)$

The mixed fraction representation of 7/3 is...

How to write the algebraic expression given: the quotient of 5 plus d and 12 minus w?

Express 200+30+5+4100+71000 as a decimal number and find its hundredths digit.

A)235.47,7

B)235.047,4

C)235.47,4

D)234.057,7Find four equivalent fractions of the given fraction:$\frac{6}{12}$

How to find the greatest common factor of $80{x}^{3},30y{x}^{2}$?