Let M := ( <mi mathvariant="normal">&#x03A9;<!-- Ω --> , <mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom

bandikizaui

bandikizaui

Answered question

2022-07-04

Let M := ( Ω , F ) be a measurable space and let M be the vector space of all ( R , B ( R ) )-valued measurable functions defined on M. If G is a sub- σ-field of F , let M G be the subspace of M whose elements are the G-measurable functions.
Suppose that F 1 , , F k are sub- σ-fields of F and let F := i = 1 k F i denote their join.
Is there any relationship between M F and M F i besides that the latter is a subset of the former? Something like the former being the sum of the latter?
i = 1 k M F i M F holds (where i = 1 k M F i := { f 1 + + f k : f i M F i , i { 1 , , k } }, but I can't see how to prove the reverse inclusion if it is indeed true.

Answer & Explanation

Amir Beck

Amir Beck

Beginner2022-07-05Added 13 answers

Consider the measure space ( [ 1 , 1 ] , B [ 1 , 1 ] ), and let F 1 = σ ( [ 0 , 1 ] ) and F 2 = σ ( f ), where f ( x ) = | x | . Note that F 2 consists of Borel sets in [−1,1] that are symmetric around 0, and F 1 F 2 is generated by the sets in { A B : A F 1 , B F 2 }. Therefore, F = B [ 1 , 1 ] . Now, the identity function is measurable w.r.t. F , but it cannot be represented as a sum of F 1 and F 2 measurable functions.

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?