A common way to define a group is as the group of structure-preserving transformations on some struc
Pamela Huerta
Answered question
2022-06-02
A common way to define a group is as the group of structure-preserving transformations on some structured set. For example, the symmetric group on a set preserves no structure: or, in other words, it preserves only the structure of being a set. When is finite, what structure can the alternating group be said to preserve? As a way of making the question precise, is there a natural definition of a category equipped with a faithful functor to such that the skeleton of the underlying groupoid of is the groupoid with objects such that ?
Answer & Explanation
atoandro8f04v
Beginner2022-06-03Added 7 answers
The alternating group preserves orientation, more or less by definition. I guess you can take to be the category of simplices together with an orientation. I.e., the objects of are affinely independent sets of points in some together with an orientation and the morphisms are affine transformations taking the vertices of one simplex to the vertices of another. Of course this is cheating since if you actually try to define orientation you'll probably wind up with something like "coset of the alternating group" as the definition. On the other hand, some people find orientations of simplices to be a geometric concept, so this might conceivably be reasonable to you.
Vicente Duran
Beginner2022-06-04Added 2 answers
Here is one idea, although I do not find it very satisfying. An object of is a finite set equipped with (or if ) total orders, all of which are even with respect to each other (in other words, basically a coset of in ). A morphism between two objects in is a map of sets preserving these orders (in other words, take one of the orderings on and apply a function to its elements. The result, after throwing out repeats, must be compatible with an ordering on .)