Does norm(A)_1 <= 1 imply that norm(A)_(max) <= 1?

ohgodamnitw0

ohgodamnitw0

Answered question

2022-09-09

Let A be a n × n square matrix, and
A 1 := max j = 1 n i = 1 n | A i , j |
and
A max := max i , j | A i , j |
1)Does A 1 1 imply that A max 1?
2)Is there any relation between A 1 and A max ?

Answer & Explanation

Derick Ortiz

Derick Ortiz

Beginner2022-09-10Added 11 answers

Since
| A i , j | max 1 i n | A i , j | ,
for each 1 j n, then
i = 1 n | A i , j | i = 1 n max 1 i n | A i , j | = n max 1 i n | A i , j |
Therefore
max 1 j n i = 1 n | A i , j | n max 1 i , j n | A i , j | .
That is
A 1 n A . ( 1 )
The estimate (1) is sharp. Meaning the factor n cannot be replaced by a smaller positive constant. To see this consider the matrix A with A i , j = 1 for which (1) is actually an equality.
Now, does A 1 control A ?
We have that
max 1 i n | A i , j | i = 1 n | A i , j | max 1 j n max 1 i n | A i , j | max 1 j n i = 1 n | A i , j |
So, it is true that
A A 1 ( 2 )
Again the constant one in (2) is sharp. When A = I n , the unit matrix, we have an equality in (2).

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?