Simplifying <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mover> <mi>A</mi> <mo stretchy="false">&#x2192;<!-- → --></mo> </mover> </mrow> <mo>&#x00D7;<!-- × --></mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mover> <mi>B</mi> <mo stretchy="false">&#x2192;<!-- → --></mo> </mover> </mrow> <mo>&#x00D7;<!-- × --></mo> <mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mover> <mi>C</mi> <mo stretchy="false">&#x2192;<!-- → --></mo> </mover> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <msup> <mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mn>2</mn>

rhenan5v

rhenan5v

Answered question

2022-10-14

I know the vector identity A × ( B × C ) = ( A C ) B ( A B ) C
Now, is there a succinct way of obtaining | A × ( B × C ) | 2 using vector algebra? I know we can expand, multiply and group the terms back, but is there a neater way of obtaining the result?
Using Levi-Civita symbols, would this be easier?

Answer & Explanation

Szulikto

Szulikto

Beginner2022-10-15Added 22 answers

Use triple product square equation or exterior algebra inner product to get
(1) ( A ( B × C ) ) 2 = | A A A B A C B A B B B C C A C B C C | .
Now we also have the equation
(2) | A × ( B × C ) | 2 = | A | 2   | B × C | 2 ( A ( B × C ) ) 2
and a little bit of inspection leads to the result
(3) | A × ( B × C ) | 2 = | 0 A B A C B A B B B C C A C B C C | .
The advantage of exterior algebra is that it works in   R n   while the usual cross product is restricted to   R 3 .

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?