Consider a quadratic equation \(\displaystyle{x}^{{{2}}}+{2}{x}={k}+{\int_{{{0}}}^{{{1}}}}{\left|{t}+{k}\right|}{\left.{d}{t}\right.}\) Then choose the correct

Asher Olsen

Asher Olsen

Answered question

2022-03-26

Consider a quadratic equation
x2+2x=k+01|t+k|dt
Then choose the correct option(s),
A) Roots are Real
B) Roots are Imaginary
C) Roots are Distinct
D) Roots are complex number

Answer & Explanation

Mikaela Winters

Mikaela Winters

Beginner2022-03-27Added 14 answers

Step 1
The discriminant b24ac is actually
1) d=4+4(k+01|t+k|dt)
Regarding calculating k+01|t+k|dt, there are 3 cases to consider:
k<1
Since t+k<0 for t from 0 to 1, this gives
k+01|t+k|dt=k+01(tk)dt
2) =k+(t22kt)01
=k+(12k)
=12
In (1), this gives d=2
Step 2
1k<0
This requires splitting the integration into 2 parts, the initial one for t from 0 to -k where
t+k0|t+k|=tk
and a second part for t from -k to 1 where t+k0|t+k|=t+k
giving
k+01|t+k|dt=k+0k(tk)dt+k1(t+k)dt
=k(t22kt)|{0}k+(t22+kt)|k1
3) =kk22+k2+12+kk22+k2
=2k+k2+12
{2}+2k+11+12
=(k+1)212
or k1, the value above is an increasing function, going from 12 to 12. Thus, d in (1) goes from 2 to 6.
Step 3
k0
This obviously gives d>0, but doing the calculations results in
k+01|t+k|dt=k+01(t+k)dt
4) =k+(t22+kt)01
=k+(12+k)
=2k+12
Thus, d in (1) is 6 at k=0, and increases without bound as k goes up.
This shows all 3 cases gives d>0, so the roots are real and distinct. Since the roots are also always complex numbers, this means options (A), (C) and (D) are true, with only (B) being false since there are no imaginary roots.
microsgopx6z7

microsgopx6z7

Beginner2022-03-28Added 14 answers

Step 1
As pointed out in comments and in John Omielan's answer, to show that there are always two roots, it suffices to show that
1+k+01|t+k|dt0
for ever kR. From triangle inequality (or reverse triangle inequality) we get that |t+k||k||t| Since we are looking only at t between 0 and 1, we can actually use
|t+k||k|t to get
1+k+01|t+k|dt
1+k+01(|k|t)dt
=1+k+01|k|dt01t dt
=1+k+|k|12
=12+k+|k|
12
(We have used x+|x|0.)
I wouldn't be trying to find some kind of proof which does not need to be split in the cases if I hadn't seen in the other answer that this always has two distinct real roots. So the credit should go there.
As a side note, I will also mention that there is this older questions: Comment upon the nature of roots of the quadratic equation x2+2x=k+01|t+k|dt depending on the value of kR However, it is now deleted, so it's visible only to 10k+ users. One interesting thing I see there is that |x|dx=x×|x|2 is used there to evaluate the integral.

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?