E.g. to find the extremum of \(\displaystyle{f{{\left({x}\right)}}}={x}-{x}^{{{2}}}\)
Lorelei Stanton
Answered question
2022-04-05
E.g. to find the extremum of we can notice that . This operation maps every value x to through the axis of symmetry and vice-versa (e.g. 0 is mapped to 6 and 6 mapped to 0). This operation preserves symmetry for the axis of symmetry and hence the extremum of the function. What about the function ? We know that the minimum of this function is at but . Also this operation maps e.g 4 to 10, but 10 to 16! Hence, this approach fails with this example (symmetry is not preserved). Why is that so? Why is this approach not working for all the quadratic functions?
Answer & Explanation
Drake Huang
Beginner2022-04-06Added 15 answers
It will work, but you need to find the correct symmetry transformation. Let's talk more about the first example, . The symmetry transformation here is because if we replace every x in with we get In other words, . We do the transformation, in this case replace x with , and arrive at the original function. Now for your second example, . To use the same argument we need to find the right transformation. In this case, the transformation is . We can verify this: Furthermore, the transformation maps 4 to -10 and -10 to 4, and we can verify symmetry in general as well. In this case the only value that doesn't change is , because . So, the axis of symmetry, as well as the minimum of the function, is at .
Matronola3zw6
Beginner2022-04-07Added 10 answers
4 doesn't get mapped to 10. 4 gets mapped to -10. And -10 gets mapped to 4. It works. The axis of symmetry is . So if you have a point it will be mapped to . So so . So . And so so . More generally if then so . And so . And .