Are the following range of values on x 3 </msub> correct given a system of inequaliti

oglasnak9h01

oglasnak9h01

Answered question

2022-05-12

Are the following range of values on x 3 correct given a system of inequalities with 3 variables?
Given the system of inequalities:
x 3 x 1 + x 2 2 2 x 3 x 1 + 3 x 2 x 3 1 x 2 11 3 x 2 3 13 x 1 <
I know that x 1 [ l o w e r x 1 , u p p e r x 1 ) = [ 13 , ) and x 2 [ l o w e r x 2 , u p p e r x 2 ] = [ 11 / 3 , 3 ].
In order to find l o w e r x 3 , u p p e r x 3 , I did the following:
l o w e r x 3 = m a x { x 1 + 3 x 2 , 1 x 2 } = { u p p e r x 1 + 3 u p p e r x 2 , 1 u p p e r x 2 } = { , 4 } =
u p p e r x 3 = l o w e r x 1 + l o w e r x 2 2 2 = 13 11 / 3 2 2 = 11 3
Is the above calculation correct? In general, is u p p e r x n = f ( l o w e r x 1 , l o w e r x 2 , , l o w e r x n 1 ) and is l o w e r x n = g ( u p p e r x 1 , u p p e r x 2 , , u p p e r x n 1 ), where f and g are some real-valued functions?

Answer & Explanation

Haylie Cherry

Haylie Cherry

Beginner2022-05-13Added 17 answers

What you've written so far is that x 3 and x 3 11 3 which doesn't make sense. In order to figure out the lower and upper bounds for x 3 , ask yourself, "What is the largest value that x 3 can be?" Since x 3 x 1 + x 2 2 2 , we know that
x 3 max ( x 1 ) + max ( x 2 ) 2 2 =
So the upper bound for x 3 is .
To find the lower bound, we ask, "What is the smallest value that x 3 can be?" Since x 3 x 1 + 3 x 2 and x 3 1 x 2 , we can conclude the following two statements:
x 3 min ( x 1 ) + 3 min ( x 2 ) = 13 + 3 ( 11 3 ) = 2
x 3 1 max ( x 2 ) = 1 ( 3 ) = 4
Notice we use a max in the second inequality because it will produce the smallest value.
Therefore it is true that x 3 4 and x 3 2. Since x 3 4 is more restrictive, we use that as our lower bound. So the lower bound for x 3 is 4.

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?