I have been given a system: y &#x2032; </msup> = A y , <mspace wi

Warren Leach

Warren Leach

Answered question

2022-06-03

I have been given a system:
y = A y , y R d , A R
for this, I believe I should use this formula for the "upper bound" on the truncation error:
1 2 h 2 y ( ξ j ) , t j ξ j t j + h
However, I am having trouble wrapping my head around what exactly y ( ξ j ) is. Is it d 2 y d t 2 , and how do I find this?

Answer & Explanation

Barbeyiae6a

Barbeyiae6a

Beginner2022-06-04Added 4 answers

Yes, it is the second derivative.
y = f ( x , y ) y = x f ( x , y ) + y f ( x , y ) y = x f ( x , y ) + y f ( x , y ) f ( x , y )
In the concrete case of a linear system
y = A y y = A y = A 2 y .
The formula in question is semi-wrong, it is only valid for a scalar equation. It is based on the mean value theorem, which in the general multivariate case does not give the same mid-point in all components of the system.

For instance, using the Taylor formula with integral remainder term giving for degree 1 gives
y ( x + h ) = y ( x ) + y ( x ) h + h 2 0 1 ( 1 s ) y ( x + s h ) d s .
For each component of y one can apply the mean value theorem for integrals. However, there is no way to force the midpoints to be the same. What is possible is to get upper bounds on the error from the upper bounds of the second derivative.

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?