There is a famous quote on linear algebra:We share a philosophy about linear algebra: we think basis-free, we write basis-free, but when the chips are down we close the office door and compute with matrices like fury.What does it mean to think and write basis free? Are there any "basis free" approaches to linear algebra?Update: The comments below raise another question related to the above quote. How can one interpret studying systems of linear equations in a basis free way.For an m × n matrix its reduced row echelon form (used in Gauss Jordan elimination) yields a unique basis of R n (take the basis of corresponding row space and adjoin to it the basis of the corresponding null space). So each matrix A has a special basis associated with it which does something nice: it solves A x = 0. How can one talk of these things in Halmos' viewpoint?

Question

There is a famous quote on linear algebra:We share a philosophy about linear algebra: we think basis-free, we write basis-free, but when the chips are down we close the office door and compute with matrices like fury.What does it mean to think and write basis free? Are there any &quot;basis free&quot; approaches to linear algebra?Update: The comments below raise another question related to the above quote. How can one interpret studying systems of linear equations in a basis free way.For an   m  ×  n matrix its reduced row echelon form (used in Gauss Jordan elimination) yields a unique basis of             R        n   (take the basis of corresponding row space and adjoin to it the basis of the corresponding null space). So each matrix   A has a special basis associated with it which does something nice: it solves   A  x  =  0. How can one talk of these things in Halmos&#039; viewpoint?

alisonhleel3 · Accepted Answer

I think what is meant here is the authors prefer to present linear algebra in the way much of abstract algebra is presented. You have sets with a certain amount of structure i.e. groups, rings, division rings etc. and maps that preserve this structure, i.e. group homomorphisms, ring homomorphisms etc. In linear algebra, the relevant objects are elements of a vector space, and the mappings are linear mappings.An illustrative example: one of the most important mappings in linear algebra, the determinant, can be defined in a &quot;coordinate free&quot; way, in addition to the way involving entries of a matrix.For example, Apostol defines the determinant as an alternating form induced by a linear mapping   T from a vector space to itself. This essentially means giving an endomorphism is the same as giving this object, called the determinant, with the properties of the determinant you know (one dimensional, multilinear, alternating).A personal note: coordinate free was how I learned linear algebra, and I think it was to my detriment; I wish people like Kaplansky kept their door open at least! Matrices are important, they show up a lot and I really think computations using them help one get a feel for linear algebra.

There is a famous quote on linear algebra: We share a philosophy about linear algebra: we think ba

Answered question

Answer & Explanation

New Questions in Linear algebra